PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

[Brian Somers]

On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:01:00 -0400, Mike Tancsa <mike at sentex.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
> wrote:
> 
> >Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
> >>wrote:
> >>  
> >>
> >>>>>Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to
> >>>>>get things working again for me.   Most of the DSL aggregators here
> >>>>>are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>        
> >>>>>
> >>>any thoughts as to why?
> >>>
> >>>FreeBSD's pppoe is going through a little development at the moment..
> >>>Now would be a good time to get it fixed..
> >>Hi,
> >>Simple LCP echos work just fine, but when using LQR things "break".
> >>There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out
> >>what was broken.  If you need another copy I am happy to post again.
> >>
> >
> >certainly it would be useful. rather than taking potsots at the archive 
> >hoping to catch it..
> >
> >pppoe is tricky because the responsibility for errors os split between 
> >the pppoe module
> > and the ppp module..
> 
> 
> Just to followup for the archives sake, the latest LQR changes do not
> fix the ppp/PPPoE problem with respect to the issue below.  I have a
> full TCPDUMP as well as ppp debug logs that illustrate the problem for
> anyone interested. 
> 
> ---Mike

And for the archive's sake... ppp has now grown an ``enable echo''
command (in -current).

-- 
Brian <brian at Awfulhak.org>                        <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
      <http://www.Awfulhak.org>                   <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !