nested ipfw dummynet pipes

Luigi Rizzo rizzo at icir.org
Fri Jun 20 10:46:40 PDT 2003


On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:41:21PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote:
> is there any way, in a bridging config, to have nested pipes?

net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=0 should do the job, i think the comment
in the manpage is now incorrect and the code (in net/bridge.c)
has been fixed (one-line) to implement this.

Check the commit logs, i don't have them handy at the moment.

	cheers
	luigi

> In particular, what i would like to achieve is a rule that
> allows e.g. 64kbps per host (src-mask 0xffffffff), but
> that all these hosts are in an overall 10Mbps pipe. The idea
> will be that @ some times of the day the pipe is less than
> full, so everyone gets 64kbps, but @ other times of the day
> the pipe is full, and I don't want more than 10Mbps flowing.
> 
> net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass looks to do what i want but:
> "Note: bridged and layer 2 packets coming out of a pipe are never
> reinjected in the firewall irrespective of the value of this
> variable."
> 
> suggests this is not the case.
> 
> Is there some technique using e.g. netgraph? Or can someone suggest
> why the note is there and if it might be easily removed?
> 
> e.g. what i have is a system with 
> 
>    em0 <--> em1
> net.link.ether.bridge_cfg="em0 em1"
> net.link.ether.bridge=1
> net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1
> net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=1
> 
> --don
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list