Call for testers: MythTV 0.21 port upgrade

[Greg Larkin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> On Thu, January 15, 2009 11:35 pm, Greg Larkin wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Greg Larkin wrote:
>>> Mark Linimon wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 04:57:58PM +0000, Craig Butler wrote:
>>>>> Any updates on the 0.21 version of Mythtv ??  I see that we are still
>>>>> at
>>>>> 0.20 in ports
>>>> If there's progress on 0.21, someone needs to say so -- the 0.20
>>>> version is already past its deletion date since it has been broken
>>>> for so long.  I'll make the commit to change the date if there is.
>>>> mcl
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am currently working on the following MythTV-related PRs and plan to
>>> close them soon:
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/126343
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/127856
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/127857
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128419
>>>
>>> Please don't delete multimedia/mythtv yet.  The last PR above contains a
>>> patch to upgrade it to 0.21.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Greg
>> Hello all of you MythTV supporters with the collective patience of the
>> universe!
>>
>> I recently committed mythtv-frontend (PR 127856) and mythtv-themes (PR
>> 127857), and please let me know if you see any problems with the updates.
>>
>> There is still some work to be done on multimedia/mythtv, and I'm
>> tackling that next.
>>
>> Thanks again for your patience and feedback!
>>
> 
> Yiiha, great to hear that :o) I will update and test as soon as time permits.
> 
> Do you plan to update multimedia/mythtv to 0.21 or just fix it and leave
> it at 0.20? Because in the later case there is at least one open compile
> problem from Torfinn Ingolfsen that hasn't been tackled down yet.
> 

Hi Bernhard,

I do plan to update multimedia/mythtv to 0.21, if at possible.  This PR
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128419) is a patch to
update 0.20, but is that the one that you're saying still has a compile
problem?

I was able to get 0.21 to compile a couple of months ago, and I can
revisit that effort to see if it makes sense to commit those changes.
If someone else has also done the same thing, I'd like to review that
effort, too.

Thank you,
Greg
- --
Greg Larkin

http://www.FreeBSD.org/       - The Power To Serve
http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJeR8T0sRouByUApARAogEAJ9fNe1aOKDAThgFkCPf5Uh0sPPvWwCcD5sL
4jwx3GS36lxCu7UHb36FRBE=
=wR97
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----