mat at cnd.mcgill.ca
Thu Apr 14 10:11:51 PDT 2005
On Apr 14, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Mathew Kanner <mat at cnd.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> >>Do I understand this patch right: it changes from DMA access to non-DMA
> >>If yes: can someone please explain me why this is a good thing?
> > Upper layer does not use DMA. It just isn't use so why
> >allocate special memeory for it.
> And our USB stack ([eou]hci) can't ever grow the feature of doing DMA?
That's a lower layer. I'm removing the DMA mem allocation in
the PCM layer. The uaudio driver does it's own buffer allocation
(though I don't think it's dma capable at that layer, but when it
is...) It's bad that we have to do so many copies but we can't just
easily rewrite the uaudio driver.
More information about the freebsd-multimedia