CPU underload

[Eugene Grosbein]

On 10.11.2015 00:39, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 11:23 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> ok, what's the l1 cache size reported at boot up?
>>
>> I think I may just bump them all to 64.
> 
> 64 is not some kind of magic panacea.  The value needs to be set to the
> cache line size for the runtime platform.  If the right value is 32,
> then setting it to 64 will just waste memory.

Is it for instruction cache or for data cache?