javavmwrapper-2.4 does not always choose the right java vm

Greg Lewis glewis at eyesbeyond.com
Sat Sep 15 15:17:06 UTC 2012


On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:12:47PM -0500, Louie Penaflor wrote:
>       I've had similar issue to:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2012-May/233089.html
> except I'm on 2.4.  I manually edited the file as the patch isn't
> the same, and it worked afterwards.

Actually, it works as designed.  You may not like the design, but it does
function the way I expect it to.

>       I'm not attaching a patch as I'm not sure if the changes I
> made is the proper solution.  Can I file a bug somewhere so it can
> be updated in the next version?  Thanks and I look forward to your
> reply!

As someone has already replied, if you want it to only use the internal
logic there is now an environment variable you can set to get that
behaviour.  This may result in utilities installed by some ports not
working as they were intended to, but you'll get the behaviour you want.

-- 
Greg Lewis                          Email   : glewis at eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond                         Web     : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
Information Technology              FreeBSD : glewis at FreeBSD.org


More information about the freebsd-java mailing list