Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others...
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
bofh at redwerk.com
Tue Dec 19 02:43:07 PST 2006
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:51:37AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> ???????? ?????????? 19 ???????????????????? 2006 11:45, ??/?? Eugeny N Dzhurinsky ????????????:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:41:12AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> > > ???????? ?????????? 19 ???????????????????? 2006 10:04, ??/?? Eugeny N
> Dzhurinsky ????????????:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote:
> > > > > It should also be run with libthr as the
> > > > > threading library, as the consensus seems to be that this provides
> > > > > better performance than libpthread (libkse).
> > > >
> > > > Very interesting. Could you please clarify how to use libthr on
> > > > 5.5/6.2, will there be a need to recompile everything?
> > >
> > > no just setup /etc/libmap.conf, like
> > > [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java]
> > > libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2
> >
> > Nice, is it possible to see does it really uses libthr.so.2?
> smth like
> smadev# ldd /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java
> /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java:
> libz.so.3 => /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28083000)
> libpthread.so.2 => /usr/lib/libthr.so.2 (0x28093000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x280a5000)
> smadev#
ldd /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/bin/java
/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/bin/java:
libz.so.2 => /lib/libz.so.2 (0x28088000)
libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 (0x28098000)
libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280bc000)
looks like I need to map libpthread.so.1 - not libpthread.so.2?
--
Eugene N Dzhurinsky
More information about the freebsd-java
mailing list