qjail or qjail2?

Kurt Jaeger lists at opsec.eu
Sun Jun 12 16:39:16 UTC 2016


Hi!

> It would certainly help if:
>   - the version of qjail supporting legacy systems was named qjail0 
> rather than qjail2

That ship probably has sailed.

>   - or the version of qjail supporting FreeBSD RELEASE-10.0 was named 
> qjail3 (or qjail4 since 4 is its minor revision now)
>   - or/and the message for qjail2 simply stated:
> 
> "This version supports FreeBSD RELEASE 8.x and 9.x. For RELEASE 10.0 and 
> newer use qjail."

Would you please submit a PR that makes this change to pkg-descr or such ?

If maintainer agrees, this would clarify it for future generations to come 8-}

-- 
pi at opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !


More information about the freebsd-jail mailing list