qjail or qjail2?
Kurt Jaeger
lists at opsec.eu
Sun Jun 12 16:39:16 UTC 2016
Hi!
> It would certainly help if:
> - the version of qjail supporting legacy systems was named qjail0
> rather than qjail2
That ship probably has sailed.
> - or the version of qjail supporting FreeBSD RELEASE-10.0 was named
> qjail3 (or qjail4 since 4 is its minor revision now)
> - or/and the message for qjail2 simply stated:
>
> "This version supports FreeBSD RELEASE 8.x and 9.x. For RELEASE 10.0 and
> newer use qjail."
Would you please submit a PR that makes this change to pkg-descr or such ?
If maintainer agrees, this would clarify it for future generations to come 8-}
--
pi at opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
More information about the freebsd-jail
mailing list