Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique

[Alejandro Imass]

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Ian Smith <smithi at nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:21:29 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>  > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Ian Smith <smithi at nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
>  > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
>

[...]

>> mentioned anywhere in this new proposal and why it isn't mentioned in
>> the current handbook either under in section "16.5.2 High-Level
>> Administrative Tools in the FreeBSD Ports Collection". If there is
>> __any__ tool that should be mentioned in the jails chapter it is

[..]

> Actually, ezjail has been explicitly mentioned in '16.6 Application of
> Jails' http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/jails-application.html since
> revision 30226 by danger, Mon May 28 20:02:46 2007 UTC, which section
> was just 6 weeks ago updated with a (preceding) similar port reference
> to qjail: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc?view=revision&revision=40900
>

Never seen it before. First time I read about service jails it wasn't
there. Further to my point doesn't it make more sense to mention them
under "16.5.2 High-Level Administrative Tools in the FreeBSD Ports
Collection" or in both places?

[...]

>
> There have been about 20 messages in freebsd-jail@ referring to ezjail
> this year so far before this thread, as in previous years; try browsing
> the archives from http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/
>

I posted on the wrong list then ;-)

Subscribing today, thanks!

-- 
Alejandro Imass