HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

[Bjoern A. Zeeb]

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:

Hi,

> Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new
>>> functionality?
>>
>> The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the
>> latter.
>
> Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and
> breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail.

This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use
single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the
output format.

/bz

PS: I trimmed the CC: list as noone was able to adhere to Reply-To.

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                      The greatest risk is not taking one.