PPPoE server (high traffic in WDM network)
Michelle Konzack
bsd4michelle at tamay-dogan.net
Thu Aug 20 14:42:09 UTC 2009
Am 2009-08-20 15:25:50, schrieb Дмитрий Замураев:
> Hello, Michelle
>
>> The main problem with the bandwidth is, that even the VOD/IPTV and VoIP
>> traffic goes throug the PPPoE server which is very bad.
> I don't think so, yes it is bad and not very bad. It depends on BRAS
> hardware.
Hmmm...
>> I do not want to count the traffic to a specific /25 which hold the
>> storage servers,If you want this, you may use the MPD-specific RADIUS
> attributes described in:
> http://mpd.sourceforge.net/doc5/mpd30.html#30
> see last paragraph.
I have tried this but it does not work.
>> mean, the VOD/IPTV and VoIP traffic must bypass the
>> PPPoE server.
> If VOD/IPTV is uses multicast - yes else you must set the pipe for this
> kind of traffic
Ehm, noy, VOD is unicast, because the user can view videos whenever
she/he want. Currently we do not know whether we support TV channels
over IPTV.
>> My idea is/was, to put the PPPoE server diretly byside the FTTH DSLAM's,
>> which mean, each 96port DSLAM has an upstrem of 1 GE and even if I put
>> 10 of them in a 42RU, it would normaly not fill the 10 GE ports of a
>> professionel Server. And of corse, I can put always two or three
>> together parallel.
> Yes, it is good idea.
I will see... It seems, that even 96 FTTH ports with 100 MBit each do
not hit the limit of a 1GE upstream, so the now I could test the
"Sun Fire X4100M2" becaus it has four 1GE ports, which mean, I can use
one as upstream and then connect the three others to up to three FTTH
DSLAMS...
Transforming a 1400 US$ Server into a pppoe server/router which has not
more then 2 GByte of memory and the smallest CPU available.
This could work.
>> The problem is only, that I can not install 10 (or 20 redunant) 1U Sun
>> Fire X4100M2, even if I can get up to 60% rebat of the listprice.
>> I have not the place to put 20 additiona servers into, nor I like the
>> power consumation ~70 Watt with the smalles CPU and only 4 GByte of RAM.
> I have't Sun servers and i can't compare Sun with i386 usage with this task
> I use i386 servers. See below.
The X4100M2 is a Opteron
> the SMP with many NIC helps, and so much
I know, the smallest Quad-Core CPU with 4 threads/core could be enough
> I use usb flash drive in read-write mode as full replace of hard drive
I do not know whether the X4100 can boot from USB-Flash, but it seems,
a SATA/CF adaptor is working or even a very cheap SATA HDD. The X4100
is not bound to SAS drives.
> for the driver see: people. yandex . ru/~wawa
OK
> 2. FreeBSD 7.2, mpd5.3 + ng_car + ng_bpf (rate-limiting
> on this machine - the perfomance of traffic processing is very good,
> because ng_car & ng_bpf is in kernel space, but have trouble
> described in PR kern/137881, i think on FBSD 7.0 it may be works fine,
> but no test are made, i'm busy)
> I think the best choise today is #2
I will give it a try
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
<http://www.tamay-dogan.net/> Michelle Konzack
<http://www.can4linux.org/> Apt. 917
<http://www.flexray4linux.org/> 50, rue de Soultz
Jabber linux4michelle at jabber.ccc.de 67100 Strabourg/France
IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ #328449886 Tel. FR: +33 6 61925193
More information about the freebsd-isp
mailing list