rndc reload and BIND9

[John Von Essen]

Even though it doesn't receive a notify, dont the slave zones do a refresh
anyway every X number of seconds (where X is specified in the zone file).

Also, we have to account for when we add a new domain/zone (which is
often). We will have to modify the main config file on the slave and issue
an rndc reload anyway.


-John

On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jett Tayer wrote:

> a master/slave relationship is better. and will only "zone transfer" what
> has changed :)
>
>
> >
> > Following a post I had about BIND9, I need to verify a certain behavior
> > with BIND9 and issuing a rndc reload.
> >
> > Instead, of having a master and slave, I am going to have two masters. One
> > master is the real master, the other gets replicated via rsync. The main
> > reason for this approach is to cut down on all the zone transfers (we
> > have 12,000 domains).
> >
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-isp at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>