p2p traffic

[Thomas Vogt]

Hi Carlos

Thats sounds nice. But as far as I know Altq does not work with our
intel gigabit ethernet cards (em0). But thanks for your information.

regards
Thomas

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:52:46 -0300
"::::Carlos:::Ariel:::Canta::::::::" <admin at redy.net.ar> wrote:

> I'm work in a ISP in Argentina, and we limit the P2p traffic with a 
> FreeBSD 4.8+bridge+altq. It a very good solution for us.
> 
> 
> Carlos Canta
> 
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:33:50 +0100, Thomas Vogt <turbo23 at gmx.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm thinking about the p2p network problem. P2p creates a lot of
> > traffic. I don't care if my backbone is full but not only with p2p
> > traffic. Atm I do some queueing with dummynet for the well known p2p
> > ports. But this looks not sufficient. Is there another, perhaps
> > better solution to decrease the p2p traffic? Blocking is no
> > alternative. Another problem is that new p2p clients uses port 80.
> > So it's very difficult to reconize the p2p traffic.
> >
> > regards
> > Thomas Vogt
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-isp at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Carlos Ariel Canta
> Dto. Tecnico Redynet S.R.L
>