Multi-Homed Routing

[Tom]

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Haesu wrote:

> < snip >
>
> >
> >   Yes, most carriers do use them.  But a major carrier is not going to use
> > some fly-by-night route registry.  In fact, several carriers operate their
> > own registries, and don't trust information from anywhere else.
>
> Ohhh yes, and they also mirror other IRR db's too.

  Some do, and some don't.  CW RR doesn't mirror RADB RR for instance.

> >   And you sure they are getting farther than that?  I see only three /24s
> > from your AS (presumably 27552), and a /21 and a /22.
>
> www.cidr-report.org They also provide view from three different ASes. Let see
> how many /24's you can count.

  Only three are visible to me here, which shows there is a proprogation
problem of some sort.

> >
> >   At least 10% of the routes in the table are unnecessary.
>
> No, you meant to say 28.8% gain by fixing deaggregates

  28.8% is greater than 10%, and I said that more than 10% of the routing
table is junk.

> -hc
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>   Haesu C.
>   TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
>   WWW: http://www.towardex.com
>   E-mail: haesu at towardex.com
>   Cell: (978) 394-2867


Tom