Please, review my change to ipfw, I want to commit it :)

[bycn82]

Hi,

i saw my previous email in this thread,but i think i replied that
without fully read all the emails.

i like the state-deny and allow,

actually i tried this, in my opinion, the state is a "shortcut" or
"soft link" which links to another rule
when the packet match the state. it will directly skip-to the rule.
and the destination rule can be allow or deny or others.



Regards,
Bill Yuan

On 6 June 2015 at 21:48, Ian Smith <smithi at nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 19:52:35 +0800, bycn82 wrote:
>
>  > *Hello,*
>  > *Can you please explain what is going one again,*
>  > *Sorry I did not follow the emails, I am not checking the FB email for a
>  > while, *
>  > *I think I missed some emails.*
>  > *e.g *
>  > *what is the purpose of the "*skip-immediate-action"
>  > *Regards,*
>  > *Bycn82*
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> please send plain text mail rather than HTML to the lists, thanks.
>
> Probably best to start at the several threads from February - some of
> which you did participate in - from:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2015-February/thread.html
>
> and then this thread from here on 1st June:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2015-June/005872.html
>
> which points to the review at:
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1776
>
> cheers, Ian
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"