kern/189720: [ipfw] [patch] pps action for ipfw

bycn82 bycn82 at gmail.com
Thu May 29 15:10:01 UTC 2014


The following reply was made to PR kern/189720; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "bycn82" <bycn82 at gmail.com>
To: "'Luigi Rizzo'" <rizzo at iet.unipi.it>,
	<bug-followup at FreeBSD.org>
Cc:  
Subject: RE: kern/189720: [ipfw] [patch] pps action for ipfw
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 23:06:27 +0800

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:rizzo at iet.unipi.it]=20
 Sent: 29 May, 2014 22:12
 To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org; bycn82 at gmail.com
 Subject: kern/189720: [ipfw] [patch] pps action for ipfw
 
 Hi,
 I have looked at the update from May 13th but it is not ready yet, the =
 code assumes HZ=3D1000 so 1 tick=3D1ms.
 
 The translation can be done in userspace or in the kernel.
 I would prefer the latter.
 I see,=20
 If the HZ=3D3, that means every tick=3D333ms
 And if the user wants to =E2=80=9C 1 packet per 500ms=E2=80=9D, then in =
 the backend will not do the exactly the same as what user expect.
 
 Actually the implementation should be =E2=80=9Cpackets per =
 ticks=E2=80=9D, so how about this? Instead of translate it in codes. Why =
 not update the document, and explain it to the user in the document ?
 
 Please note that the count might need to be adjusted accordingly if 1/HZ =
 > duration. I covered most of these things in the email exchange before =
 the patch was submitted.
 
 cheers
 luigi
 


More information about the freebsd-ipfw mailing list