IPFIREWALL_FORWARD

[n j]

> it's needed for the functionality.
> you need to slightly change the behaviour or the existing stack in quite a
> number of places to handle a forwarded packet.

Sorry for catching up with the thread so late, I was without Internet
connection for the last couple of days.

Thanks for all the replies so far, I've got just one more question: is
it correct that pf (as loadable module) has this forward (aka
route-to) functionality without needing the kernel recompile? If so,
it might be that final push for me to switch from ipfw to pf.

Regards,
-- 
Nino