Traffic quota features in IPFW
julian at elischer.org
Mon Jul 18 07:06:54 GMT 2005
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:34:56AM +0000, Walery Kokarev wrote:
>>And why can't one use divert(4) interface? It looks quite suitable for
>>that particular task.
> no _that_ would really be a performance killer!
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
unless you divert to a netgraph socket within the kernel :-)
(or use the new ipfw netgraph diversion facility)
More information about the freebsd-ipfw