hostnames resolving problem

Marcin Gryszkalis mg at fork.pl
Fri Aug 22 12:21:52 PDT 2003


On 2003-08-22 01:38, Antonio Torres wrote:
>> (I'm using ipfw2 on 4-STABLE). The ipfw resolves name to
>> *first* ip assigned to the name - but I expect to have *all*
>> ip addresses in the rule. eg.

> the "name to IP" feature only aplies at rule load !
> i.e. when, and only when, the ipfw rule is loaded the name is translated 
> to IP...
> 
> look on `man ipfw` for "me" clause (me= my IP address)...

yes, I know that - but - isn't my question/description clear?
Maybe I'll extend the example.

I issue follownig command:

# ipfw add 10000 allow tcp from any to smtp.o2.pl smtp setup

Current result is that following rule is loaded:

10000 allow tcp from any to 212.126.20.58 dst-port 25 setup

Expected result is following:

10000 allow tcp from any to 212.126.20.58, 212.126.20.60, 212.126.20.61 dst-port 25 setup

(the name smtp.o2.pl has 3 IP addresses assigned)

regards
-- 
Marcin Gryszkalis
http://fork.pl
<><



More information about the freebsd-ipfw mailing list