ipfw dynamic rule timeout

[Antoine Jacoutot]

On Wednesday 30 April 2003 06:58, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> I think several of the articles point to the easiest solution: Don't
> use keep-state rules in conjunction with natd(8). Keep-state doesn't
> offer you anything more than using natd(8) with stateless rules for
> the vast majority of policies.

Yes, thanks, that's what I though too.
I guess I'll just have to write a new "stateless" ruleset (I always used 
keep-state).
Regards.

Antoine