IRQ31 and IRQ32 on HPDL585 running FreeBSD 7.0 are consuming
HIGH CPU usage
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Thu Nov 13 11:47:01 PST 2008
On Thursday 13 November 2008 03:19:36 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:07:37AM -0800, Won De Erick wrote:
> > Noted on this, I will update you through this thread.
> >
> > However is there any possibility of the following:
> >
> > > I don't know if there's a way to split the interrupt request for each
bce's Rx and Tx,
> > > which means a total of four IRQs, and eventually four cores (or 4 CPUs)
> > > for the transactions. With this way, the IDLE processors would be
utilized.
> >
> > What I mean here is, for the two interfaces:
> >
> > one IRQ for bce0 Rx
> > one IRQ for bce0 Tx
> > one IRQ for bce1 Rx
> > one IRQ for bce1 Tx
>
> I can't even begin to imagine how this would be possible on any NIC.
igb(4) does it. It is quite possible and one of the purposes of MSI.
However, the current bce(4) hardware does not support this. It only allows
for a single message and thus a single IRQ per-device.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the freebsd-hardware
mailing list