regex(3)/grot

Kyle Evans kevans91 at ksu.edu
Fri Apr 7 14:19:58 UTC 2017


Hello!

Over the next week or so, I plan to address inconsistencies in regex(3)
handling of invalid bounds/atom constructs [1] between BREs and EREs, and
found grot [2]. This appears to have once upon a time been the vehicle for
regression testing of regex(3), but seems to have been replaced by the
netbsd test suite (see: [3]).

Does grot still serve a purpose, or can it go away? All of its tests seem
to have been split out into individual tests grouped by functionality in
the netbsd-tests suite [4], which is a model that seems ideal. On top of
that, I'm not smart enough to actually build any of the targets in its
Makefile and I don't feel a compelling urge to make it work on its own.

Thanks,

Kyle Evans

[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166861
[2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libc/regex/grot/
[3]
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libc/tests/regex/Makefile?view=markup
[4]
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc/regex/data/


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list