Sysctl as a Service, or: making sysctl(3) more friendly for monitoring systems
Warner Losh
wlosh at bsdimp.com
Tue Dec 13 05:29:48 UTC 2016
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 10:27 PM, Peter Jeremy <peter at rulingia.com> wrote:
>
> On 2016-Dec-12 17:57:07 -0700, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Ed Schouten <ed at nuxi.nl> wrote:
>>> $ time ./prometheus_sysctl_exporter | wc -l
>>> 0.00 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys
>>> 3162
>>>
>>> If our sysctl tree would get substantially larger at some point, we
>>> should of course revisit this.
>>
>> That sounds cool. I'd love to see what you came up with to get those results.
>
> I think that's impressive as well.
>
>> While we're here... there's one thing I'd love to see from a
>> hypothetical /dev/sysctl... When a sysctl value changes (or some
>> subset), I'd like it to appear on a read-channel. That way, I could
>> monitor temperature w/o needing to constantly poll for changes, for
>> example.
>
> That sounds like a job for kqueue(2), though it would need to be plumbed
> through. The biggest problem I see is that nothing in the sysctl mechanism
> has any way of reporting that a value has changed and so consumers of that
> data should re-check. This means that you'd probably just wind up polling
> in the kernel.
It does if you had a read-channel :)
> Note that Prometheus is designed around regularly polling the systems it's
> monitoring so this sort of functionality wouldn't benefit it.
True.
Warner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20161212/1001e955/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list