Missing "Local system status"

[John Baldwin]

On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 12:52:22 PM Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:41:21AM -0400 I heard the voice of
> Kurt Lidl, and lo! it spake thus:
> > 
> > So the real argument ought to be if rwhod/ruptime ought to be part of a
> > different MK_xxx,
> 
> I think Peter's point is that 430.status-rwho shows uptime(1) info
> too, if rwhod isn't writing out data for it to ruptime(1), so it's
> still useful even without r*.  Which also means it's slightly
> misnamed, but...

Humm.  I'm inclined to just always install it.   Having a second
script would just duplicate code (and then having rwho in the name
would be confusing).

-- 
John Baldwin