Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?..
Erich Dollansky
erichfreebsdlist at ovitrap.com
Tue Oct 30 12:43:16 UTC 2012
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:46 +0000
Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst at tdx.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> --On 30 October 2012 18:27 +0700 Erich Dollansky
> <erichfreebsdlist at ovitrap.com> wrote:
>
> > is it still the same compiler?
>
> Depends how you mean 'the same' - on the 6.4 system it shows:
>
> cc (GCC) 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
>
> And, on the 9.0-S it shows:
>
> cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
>
> So 'same' - but different versions.
>
did you check the default data sizes?
> > I assume that it is a plain FreeBSD program without X.
>
> Yes. They are 'plain' programs - no X or anything.
>
> Now they've been running for an hour or so - they've gotten a little
> larger 552M/154M and 703M/75M.
>
> If it's not harmful I can live with it - it was just a bit of a
> surprise.
And a reason to spend more money on memory. Knowing the real reason
would be better.
I can understand your surprise.
Erich
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list