[CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:12:53AM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:41:46 -0600, Warner Losh writes:
> >It's called a transition period for a reason.  The historical use has =
> >permeated itself into many places, not all of which are obvious.
> 
> It would seem that leaving FreeBSD make as make, for the transition
> period and installing bmake as bmake, would cause the least disruption
> to everyone.  This was the original proposal presented at BSDCan in 2011.
> 
> FreeBSD make already grok's the :tl and :tu modifiers,
> so it is quite simple for the two to coexist for some period.
> 
> The only reason we are talking about having to frob ports etc now, 
> is a new requirement introduced this year (by yourself I think)
> that bmake replace make in base rather than allow coexistence.
> 
> If we are all happy to go back to the original plan, we can ease the
> concerns of the folk you speak of?
> 
> The only downside is we wait a few more years for major build improvments.

Can system build, initiated by make, call bmake immediately ?
I suppose it could be fine even to error out if make is typed instead of
bmake for src/.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20121026/25aa2f8f/attachment.sig>