8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
Alex Goncharov
alex-goncharov at comcast.net
Fri Feb 17 22:41:27 UTC 2012
,--- You/rank1seeker at gmail.com (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:08:02 +0100) ----*
| > For me as a user, that would be a much preferable approach, instilled
| > long ago by Linux. I don't like unused stuff around, and I like to
| > understand what I am using.
| >
| > Some build kernel confutation parameters "minimum modules", "medium
| > modules", "maximum modules" might be utilized. I would be using
| > "medium" or most likely "maximum", leaving me with a minimal kernel.
| >
| > -- Alex -- alex-goncharov at comcast.net --
|
| NO.
What does your "NO" stand for? That it would not be a preferable
approach "For me as a user"? I wasn't speaking for others :)
| > Thinking bigger picture (beyond sound), would it make sense to keep
| > GENERIC very minimal, but provide an extensive loader.conf with a
| > default install...so most things worked, but were loaded as modules?
| >
| > Matt
|
| NO.
"NO" here: would not make sense? It will be unlikely done but how do
you know what makes sense for others?
I for one, don't have any interest in the PCCARD code built into the
kernel. Etc.
| You can't base a "wish" on a solution for YOURS problems!
I was not asking for the new code, but I could express my idea of what
made sense for me.
| GENERIC must be as giantic as possible, to make as many machines as possible to BOOT and enable all what can be enabled in/on them.
| THEN ... individual "strips" unhooked parts -> custom kernel, via
| wich you "specialize it", for your hardware!
Then provide MINIMAL in sys/ARCH/conf, and one could use it (I am not
asking for it -- I've been doing it on my own -- I am talking in
principle.)
| That is, unless individual is passive/bored (lazy?) and prefer everything on a silver plate ...
I don't see any logic in how you passed to this passage.
| There are many paths in that case ...
| Windows are the easiest solution. THEY THINK FOR YOU!
| ;)
Ditto.
What's bad in "the easiest solution" per se?
And one would be not prudent to keep laughing over Windows, thinking
Windows NT, when 8 is almost here.
But this is off topic, sorry, you all.
-- Alex -- alex-goncharov at comcast.net --
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list