KDB_TRACE and no backend

[Andriy Gapon]

on 18/09/2010 21:41 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 18/09/2010 21:26 Attilio Rao said the following:
>>
>> You have to eventually wrap this logic within the 'STACK' option
>> (opt_stack.h for the check) because stack_save() will be uneffective
>> otherwise. STACK should be mandatory for DDB I guess, but it is not
>> for KDB.
> 
> Thank you for the tip!
> BTW, why is this under an option?
> It seems like something like this won't add much to kernel size and won't affect
> performance at all.
> 

Oh, wow, and I totally overlooked stack_print().
Should have read stack(9) from the start.

-- 
Andriy Gapon