Multiple netgraph threads
mav at FreeBSD.org
Sun Mar 30 04:22:09 PDT 2008
Robert Watson wrote:
> FYI, you might be interested in some similar work I've been doing
> in the rwatson_netisr branch in Perforce, which:
> Adds per-CPU netisr threads
Thanks. Netgraph from the beginning uses concept of direct function
calls, when level of parallelism limited by data source. In that point
multiple netisr threads will give benefits.
> My initial leaning would be that we would like to avoid adding too many
> more threads that will do per-packet work, as that leads to excessive
> context switching.
Netgraph uses queueing only as last resort, when direct call is not
possible due to locking or stack limitations. For example, while working
with kernel sockets (*upcall)() I have got many issues which make
impossible to freely use received data without queueing as upcall()
caller holds some locks leading to unpredicted LORs in socket/TCP/UDP code.
In case of such forced queueing, node becomes an independent data source
which can be pinned to and processed by whatever specialized thread or
netisr, when it will be able to do it more effectively.
More information about the freebsd-hackers