OpenBSD sdiff Question
Bert JW Regeer
xistence at 0x58.com
Mon Mar 17 18:56:18 UTC 2008
On Mar 15, 2008, at 23:29 , David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 03:21:01PM -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
>> Even if BSD has no tradition to keep a separate program version, it
>> is
>> still very handy to be able to give this data to other developers if
>> something is failing.
>
> $ ident failing-binary is the output that means something. A version
> string will not.
>
>
>> Programs that don't have a -v or --version switch are frustrating to
>
> Anyone used to working on BSD will not expect a -v switch. It isn't
> part
> of BSD tradition. The simple fact there is no obivous "version" to
> print
> just shows that in a OS that is developed and built as a whole,
> having a
> version on the util is meaningless.
>
>> Dropping -v would be a bad thing, and make the tools not compatible,
>> thus breaking many scripts that do expect a -v.
>
> Come on, how many scripts do you write that do "sdiff -v" today?
>
> --
> -- David (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
>
I see the reasoning behind dropping it now. It certainly make sense as
you and Peter Jeremy describe it, I have just never thought of it that
way.
Cheers,
Bert JW Regeer
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list