Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux
obrien at FreeBSD.org
Thu Mar 6 04:24:58 UTC 2008
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:02:17PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20080304174045.GB90931 at dragon.NUXI.org>
> "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> : On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:58:15AM +0100, Rink Springer wrote:
> : > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:17:30AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> : > > Solaris lacks TAILQ_xxx stuff too, so I would prefer something like
> : > > "bsdcompat.h" or similar.
> : >
> : > Seconded - "linux.h" is far too generic. I must say I like the idea
> : > of being able to build *BSD on Linux machines!
> : Why? What are you going to do with it? Presumable install it
> : somewhere, where?
> : Will the differences in the end result of what is built worth the risk,
> : vs. installing VMware player and building FreeBSD on FreeBSD on Linux?
> The end result will be the ability to build FreeBSD on a Linux host.
> VMware players aren't an option, and will not be contemplated as an
> acceptable solution. The overhead is too high, especially when
> explaining to people what needs to be done to deploy.
I think you're wrong about the overhead is too high... - but the proof
will be in the pudding. With installing VMware player and building
FreeBSD on FreeBSD - all the 10,000's of docs explaining to users how
to build will be valid.
With this cross build these docs will be wrong - folks will be much more
on their own.
Beyond the docs - I think you underestimate the amount of work getting
all the cross-tools built and installed will be.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
-- David (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?
Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"
More information about the freebsd-hackers