Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux
Robert Watson
rwatson at FreeBSD.org
Tue Mar 4 15:38:40 UTC 2008
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : In most ports of FreeBSD parts to Linux that I've seen, the preferred solution
> : has to been to bring the entire FreeBSD queue.h with you rather than relying
> : on the native Linux queue.h. This is what we do for OpenBSM, for example;
> : this also helps out when you get to Mac OS X, Solaris, etc, where all the
> : queue.h's continue to vary in subtle ways. This depends a fair amount on a
> : lack of header pollution in the OS's own include files, of course...
>
> I was rather hoping for something that could be used without any of that
> nonsense...
Sadly, nonsense seems to be the name of the game in software portability.
Here's the broken autoconf garbage I use to pick out adequate queue.h's from
inadequate ones:
# sys/queue.h exists on most systems, but its capabilities vary a great deal.
# test for LIST_FIRST and TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE, which appears to not exist in
# all of them, and are necessary for OpenBSM.
AC_TRY_LINK([
#include <sys/queue.h>
], [
#ifndef LIST_FIRST
#error LIST_FIRST missing
#endif
#ifndef TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE
#error TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE
#endif
], [
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_FULL_QUEUE_H,, Define if queue.h includes LIST_FIRST)
])
Note that there are at least a couple of mostly stylistic bugs there (could
use compile rather than link, definition description is poor, errors are
inconsistent). :-) I found that on both Linux and Mac OS X, the queue.h's
didn't have everything I wanted.
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list