Solaris libumem port on the works
pfgshield-freebsd at yahoo.com
pfgshield-freebsd at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 15 19:03:29 UTC 2006
--- John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j at resnet.uoregon.edu> ha scritto:
...
>
> It's definately interesting, but doubtful will ever be imported to
> replace libc's malloc for one reason.. the CDDL is effectively the
> GPL:
...
It's nevertheless less viral. I don't want libumem in the base distribution
though... it can be a port. Many people find a userland malloc useful.
>
> That's why I started work on rewriting a allocated based upon the
> paper so that it'd have a BSD license... I haven't worked on it much,
> and now that jemalloc is here, who knows...
>
Hmmm... from what I've read on mailing lists and blogs... while libumem is in
general a good performer, certain applications, like X, can actually get a
performance hit. Where libumem shines is while debugging: memory leaks, double
frees, can be found very easily.
I agree jemalloc is here to stay.
Pedro.
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list