[PATCH] sbin/route should attempt to resolve hostnames for INET6

[Hajimu UMEMOTO]

Hi,

>>>>> On Sat, 21 May 2005 00:39:51 +0200
>>>>> Andreas Kohn <andreas at syndrom23.de> said:

andreas> attached is a small patch to /sbin/route.c 1.78 so that route's behavior
andreas> matches the description from the manpage:

andreas>      All symbolic names specified for a destination or gateway are
andreas>      looked up first as a host name using gethostbyname(3).  If this
andreas>      lookup fails, getnetbyname(3) is then used to interpret the name as
andreas>      that of a network.

I've committed it.

andreas> - removes SOCK_DGRAM requirement, which was marked as "dummy".
andreas>   getaddrinfo(3) says 0 should be given if one does not care

No, we should care it in usual.  Unless this, two entries are
returned; one is for SOCK_DGRAM and the other is for SOCK_STREAM.  I
feel that `dummy' means route(8) doesn't use ai_socktype later.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/