FUD about CGD and GBDE

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <20050303163731.GA8001 at panix.com>, Thor Lancelot Simon writes:

>I could not disagree more.  When it comes to nonstandard homebrewed
>cryptosystems foisted off on unsuspecting users with a bundle of
>claims of algorithm strength that they're not competent to evaluate
>for themselves, we do not need more ideas, nor more people trying
>out ideas; we need less.
>
>Standard, widely analyzed cryptographic algorithms are good.

s/ are good/, when applied with caution and wisdom, are good/

:-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.