contigmalloc() and mmap()
Scott Long
scottl at samsco.org
Mon Jun 13 18:58:23 GMT 2005
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:37:07PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>
>>How does linux handle the implications of fork(2) in this scenario?
>
>
> it's still counted as the same instance. Similar for dup or passing
> descriptors over AF_UNIX sockets. The data is explictly not per-process
> but per instance.
>
> There's not a lot of users actually using this feature, only the tty
> subsystem and multi-channel sound drivers for the old oss API that
> allowed multiple opens of /dev/dsp that way come to mind.
>
> Lot's of driver use file->private to get at per-device data easily,
> but that's just a shortcut.
Ok, I thought that you were talking about per-process data being in the
file descriptor.
Scott
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list