duplicate CVS modules in merged CVSROOT

Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net
Fri Dec 17 06:41:22 PST 2004


On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:09:45AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav:
> 
> >Dmitry Morozovsky <marck at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > 
> >
> >>It seems some checks should be added to module merging code...
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >...or somebody should stop using the merged CVSROOT.
> >
> I suggest to add prefixes like src_cut, port_cut while merging.

As discussed on Another List, that's the way it is *supposed* to be,
at least for the ports_* prefix.  That's the way it's been for ages now -
for ports which conflict with the src tree, a 'ports_' prefix is added
to the CVSROOT module definition.  Lots of examples in the
CVSROOT-ports/modules file :)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev	roam at ringlet.net    roam at cnsys.bg    roam at FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
This sentence contradicts itself - or rather - well, no, actually it doesn't!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20041217/8a51b38d/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list