duplicate CVS modules in merged CVSROOT
Peter Pentchev
roam at ringlet.net
Fri Dec 17 06:41:22 PST 2004
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:09:45AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav:
>
> >Dmitry Morozovsky <marck at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >
> >
> >>It seems some checks should be added to module merging code...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >...or somebody should stop using the merged CVSROOT.
> >
> I suggest to add prefixes like src_cut, port_cut while merging.
As discussed on Another List, that's the way it is *supposed* to be,
at least for the ports_* prefix. That's the way it's been for ages now -
for ports which conflict with the src tree, a 'ports_' prefix is added
to the CVSROOT module definition. Lots of examples in the
CVSROOT-ports/modules file :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net roam at cnsys.bg roam at FreeBSD.org
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
This sentence contradicts itself - or rather - well, no, actually it doesn't!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20041217/8a51b38d/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list