FAST_IPSEC bug fix
Sam Leffler
sam at errno.com
Sat Apr 24 12:58:09 PDT 2004
On Apr 24, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature
>>> compared
>>> to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
>>> committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
>>
>> The fix was not quite right for -current (where it needs to go in
>> first). I sent out the attached patch for testing but received no
>> feedback. Until I can get it tested and committed to -current it
>> won't be MFC'd.
>
> We dont run -current here, so I dont have anything to test it on.
> Also, due to the bugs in the driver with HiFn 7955, we have had to
> abandon FAST_IPSEC :(
Running FAST IPSEC w/o h/w crypto is still faster than KAME IPsec. See
the results in my BSDCon paper.
Sam
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list