FAST_IPSEC bug fix

Sam Leffler sam at errno.com
Sat Apr 24 12:58:09 PDT 2004


On Apr 24, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:

>
> At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature 
>>> compared
>>> to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
>>> committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
>>
>> The fix was not quite right for -current (where it needs to go in 
>> first).  I sent out the attached patch for testing but received no 
>> feedback.  Until I can get it tested and committed to -current it 
>> won't be MFC'd.
>
> We dont run -current here, so I dont have anything to test it on.  
> Also, due to the bugs in the driver with HiFn 7955, we have had to 
> abandon FAST_IPSEC :(

Running FAST IPSEC w/o h/w crypto is still faster than KAME IPsec.  See 
the results in my BSDCon paper.

	Sam



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list