differences in USB support between FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x ?

[Bernd Walter]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 15:00, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
> > > [I sent the same message to usb-bsd at eleetbsd.org, but since that list
> > > seems not very active, I am asking here too]
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > the subject says it all.
> > >
> > > I am considering using FreeBSD for a robotics project, and I am
> > > thinking of using 4.x for stability. But, since we will probably use
> > > USB a lot, I am wondering if maybe 5.x is a better choice.
> >
> > I believe 4.x has all you need for your project.
> > If you really find a problem then the missing part can be MFC'ed.
> Both 4.x and 5.x have a pointer-bug in the ugen-driver causing memory to be 
> overwritten outside a buffer when using isochronous transfers. I have sent a 
> PR about this (with patch) back in April.
> **(: HINT HINT :) **
> ( pr kern/51186 : http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern%2F51186 )

I'll take a look at this.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
ticso at bwct.de                                  info at bwct.de