current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?

[Gordon Tetlow]

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
> > > 
> > > I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
> > > give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
> > 
> > Well, all I did was test your research :-)
> 
> Gordon Tetlow (victim CC'd) was, I believe, working on changes to rc.d to
> allow automatic construction of jails at boot, and part of that was some
> best practice devfs rules for jail.  Perhaps he could chime in now? :-)

No, that wasn't me. If I had to guess it was either mtm@ or mike@ (or maybe
some other Mike in the project).

-gordon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20030705/e242f62f/attachment.bin