x86-64 support

[Peter Jeremy]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:15:01AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
>Wilko Bulte wrote:
>> > And I would have thought it would have been obvious.. :-/
>> 
>> I would have thought so too... :-/
>> 
>> Maybe have it display: 3.1415926535897 MHz?

I also thought it looked a bit dodgy until I read the disclaimer at
the end.  How about 2.71828182846 MHz?  Or maybe 299.7925 MHz.

>Don't get me started... :-)  I still have the first ~50 or so digits
>memorized.  Or even worse, I could put a pi calculator in the kernel. :-)

And people think I'm wierd because I know the first 19 digits :-).
Why not just print a random number?

Peter