irc/xchat: limit icon blinking time
Eitan Adler
lists at eitanadler.com
Sun Jun 24 04:01:08 UTC 2012
Adding portmgr here to cc: should we accept new patches which add
additional features or fix upstream bugs, not specific to us, as local
FreeBSD ports trees patches?
On 23 June 2012 18:45, Doug Barton <dougb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Several of my ports, to start with. Which is why I'm concerned at your
> attempt to change policy by fiat.
I'm not attempting to change anything. FWIW, why don't you upstream
the patches in your ports?
>> Our own stuff is completely unrelated. The question at hand is do we
>> continue development of third party software by means of patches to
>> the ports tree?
>> And the answer has always been, "Yes." I have no idea where you got any
> other idea.
As I understand it the answer has always been no: we don't continue
development of third party software in ports more than necessary to
make it function on FreeBSD.
--
Eitan Adler
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list