ports/118481: big5-2003 in converters/libiconv
Alexander Nedotsukov
bland at FreeBSD.org
Sun Dec 16 21:40:03 PST 2007
The following reply was made to PR ports/118481; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland at FreeBSD.org>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Cc: Wei-Hao Syu <whsyu at ntu.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: ports/118481: big5-2003 in converters/libiconv
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:37:52 +0900
I understand the difference. My question was more about why you can not
use BIG5-2003 when it appropriate? The point is BIG5 in its original
form is not a subset of BIG5-2003. There are code points defined
differently. So what you asking for is technically illegal. However if
this is an *official* way you do it in Taiwan (which will be really
weird case) please convince GNU libiconv developers to switchover.
Wei-Hao Syu wrote:
> because of katakana and hiragana.
>
> The major difference between big5-2003/big5-1984 is big5-2003 has
> katakana and hiragana mapping ( from big5-eten). big5-2003 is part of
> official standard in Taiwan and most Taiwanese have the requirement
> (katakana, hiragana support) when using ftp/bbs with big5 encoding,
> that is why we need this one.
>
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:25:35 +0900 , Alexander Nedotsukov
> <bland at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>> Could you explain why you need this hack and what is more important
>> how it will interact with other variants of BIG5 family, please? I
>> can see that this silent switchover may lead to incompatibility
>> between hacked and clean systems which is not good thing IMHO. In any
>> case I strictly recommend you to put pressure on GNU libiconv
>> developers to resolve issue at the right place.
>>
>
>
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list