[kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree

Joe Marcus Clarke marcus at FreeBSD.org
Mon May 1 17:47:54 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

michael johnson wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Michael Nottebrock <lofi at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> Michael Nottebrock schrieb:
>> > michael johnson schrieb:
>> >
>> >> kdegraphics depends on xpdf and gnome depends on poppler.
>> >> and xpdf and poppler conflict. However, kdegraphics could
>> >> depend on poppler, it is a dropin replacement for xpdf. =)
>> >
>> > That's doable, I'll get right on it.
>>
>> Actually, I think it would be best to split the poppler port up one more
>> time and create an extra port for the command line utilities, that way
>> the conflict with xpdf can be resolved completely. Should I work on that?
> 
> 
> If you split the tools it will still have to depend on the poppler lib.

But you wouldn't have to necessarily install the command bits.  Is that
a true statement?  That is, if we only installed the poppler libraries
and headers would we be crippling envince?

Joe

- --
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	gnome at FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEVknjb2iPiv4Uz4cRAj/gAJ9YFE6ZSOIOH822M1lZ1VqcIyv0XACgm3a4
9U8k1xiJmcIR+Ym+p3dA/iY=
=Y9xg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the freebsd-gnome mailing list