Request feedback for GCONF_SCHEMAS in porting.sgml..

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Messenger wrote:
| On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:15:55 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke
| <marcus at marcuscom.com> wrote:
|
|> On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 19:24, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
|>
|>> Hello,
|>>
|>> I need some feedbacks for my change in porting.sgml in the 'GConf Schema
|>> Installation' section about the new GCONF_SCHEMAS. If it doesn't clear
|>> enough, just let me know with the explanation why it is not clear or
|>> whatever. English grammar check would be great too. Thanks!
|>>
|>> BTW: bsd.gnome.mk will be next after this feedback.
|>
|>
|> "...these schema files <tt>%gconf.xml</tt> key files were listed in the
|
|
| Add an 'and' here for 'schema files and <tt>%gconf.xml</tt> key files.
|
|> port's <tt>pkg-plist</tt>.  Since this proved to be problematic,
|> handling of GConf schemas was changed to something similar to that of <a
|>
href="http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-manpages.html">MAN<i>n</i></a>

|> files.  That is, for each schema file installed by your port, you
|> must  have the following listed in the <tt>Makefile</tt>:"
|>
|> How about that instead?
|
|
| Looks good with add an 'and'. I also changed s/SCHEMAS/schema/g in the
| bottom. Update patch is attaching..

This looks good to me.

Joe



- --
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBSyLGb2iPiv4Uz4cRAmADAJ93QTIzqrlXSj4w423HiRfeod0PNACgipfe
PWHtCjx5BO5bMUgqwnx7FfY=
=Gymv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----