ethereal working for everyone else with latest gnome?

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:16, Mike Harding wrote:
> Sorry, I neglected to mention that I used a capture filter as well
> when I saw the problem.  Don't have the problem when I force it to
> build against gtk1.2, though, so it might have something to do with
> gtk...
> 
> I modified the line in the makefile:
> 
> .if defined(WITH_GTK2) || (${HAVE_GNOME:Mgtk20}!="")
> 
> to 
> 
> .if defined(WITH_GTK2)
> 
> in order to get ethereal to build with gtk12.
> 
> Does this fix the issue for you as well?

Yes, gtk12 fixes the issue for me as well.

Joe

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Mike H.
> 
>    >From mvh  Thu May 20 09:18:04 2004
>    X-Original-To: mvh at bsd.mvh
>    From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus at marcuscom.com>
>    Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome at freebsd.org>, billf at freebsd.org
>    Organization: MarcusCom, Inc.
>    Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 12:18:18 -0400
>    X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
> 	   version=2.63
>    X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on 
> 	   creme-brulee.marcuscom.com
>    X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bsd.mvh
>    X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
>    X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.000000
>    X-DSPAM-Signature: !DSPAM:40acda3c779247817319249!
> 
> 
>    --=-Y115puRiW+LUzOKelINf
>    Content-Type: text/plain
>    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
>    On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 11:24, Mike Harding wrote:
>    > Anyone else having problems with a fresh build of ethereal from ports?
>    > It looks like events are being processed - windows don't refresh, the
>    > stop button doesn't work, etc.  I haven't had this problem before and
>    > am wondering if it has anything to do with the gnome upgrade...
>    >=20
>    > I also built 0.10.4 and it has the same problem.
>    >=20
>    > I built it to run under gtk1.2 by modifying the makefile and it seems
>    > to work properly when built that way...
> 
>    I see the same thing, but only when I enter a capture filter.  If I just
>    do a full capture, the problem does not occur.  I thought it had to do
>    with ADNS.  The problem occurred under GNOME 2.4, so I do not think it's
>    GNOME related.
> 
>    Joe
> 
>    >=20
>    > - Mike H.
>    > _______________________________________________
>    > freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org mailing list
>    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
>    > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>    --=20
>    PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
> 
> 
> 
>    --=-Y115puRiW+LUzOKelINf
>    Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
>    Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> 
>    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>    Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
> 
>    iD8DBQBArNpKb2iPiv4Uz4cRAqF4AJ9Lb25PsN1tL6u+d8wHXLop+22TOQCeI5At
>    Mg/Ql5a9jNAM7X3n69oKPJ4=
>    =UaLC
>    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
>    --=-Y115puRiW+LUzOKelINf--
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040520/e3b1b63f/attachment-0001.bin