Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www ->
editors and some clean up
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Wed Mar 31 10:40:55 PST 2004
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:58:39 -0800, John Merryweather Cooper
<coop9211 at uidaho.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:45, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 03:15:50 -0800, John Merryweather Cooper
>> <coop9211 at uidaho.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > A number of points:
>> >
>> > 1) the update is good as 0.10.1 has just been released and is the
>> stable
>> > version;
>> >
>> > 2) the repo copy should be denied unless all of the HTML editors (such
>> > as bluefish) are going to be moved from www/ to editors/;
>>
>> This is next, I am planning to submit about move bluefish to editors.
>
> This is a bad idea. What about all the other non-broswer utilities in
> www/? For that matter, on a purists note one could re-align most of the
> ports tree into editors on the grounds that the program was really an
> editor modifying a file.
Add like 'editors gnome www' should be good as long editors is main.
> I think the original intention was that editors would refer to compiler
> language editors and text editors, and that other editors would go
> elsewhere.
Editors is an editor, nothing more and nothing less. As you said, 'text
editors' and this HTML editor is a text editor too. :-)
Cheers,
Mezz
--
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
More information about the freebsd-gnome
mailing list