Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www -> editors and some clean up

[Jeremy Messenger]

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:20:19 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke 
<marcus at marcuscom.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 13:06, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 12:56, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:25:54 +0200, Kirill Ponomarew 
>> <krion at FreeBSD.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:19:47PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>> > > >> With www/peacock maintainer's hat on:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> OMG why??
>> > > >
>> > > > Because these *are* editors, doesn't matter what formats they
>> > > > can edit. The main purpose of this software is to edit
>> > > > something.
>> > >
>> > > I second!
>> >
>> > I third.  Their primary purpose is an editor.  They should be
>> > cross-referenced to www.  That way, all the indexing tools will still
>> > show them in both categories.
>> >
>> > Joe
>> >
>>
>> Well, once you've got a committer on your side, I'm going to lose, but I
>> think the organization structure of the tree needs some serious
>> consideration if we're heading in this direction.
>
> My opinion certainly isn't law.  I agree that the tree does need some
> work, and probably some dedicated resources to do cataloging.  Portmgr
> is working on a new tree layout, so it's probably good to leave things
> where they are for now.  However, if I was adding an HTML editor, my
> first thought would be, "editors."

Ok, I didn't know anything about a new tree layout. I am going to create a 
better new diff with no touch catologies, update email in pkg-descr and 
textproc/libcroco depend.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Joe
>
>>
>> jmc
>>
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Mezz
>> > >
>> > > > -Kirill


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.