Repo copy graphics/gimp-devel -> graphics/gimp2?

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 11:06, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> 
> >V pá, 26. 03. 2004 v 21:33, Jeremy Messenger píše:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>The graphics/gimp-devel is now in the stable version, so isn't it good 
> >>time to repo copy it to as graphics/gimp2? :-)
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I'd rather see graphics/gimp, with graphics/gimp1 gone.
> >I filed a PR for repocopy machinery, see 
> >
> >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?q=64804
> >
> >Comments from other GNOME team members before I turn it over on portmgr?
> >
> >  
> >
> Yep. GIMP1 must be retired. I mailed Joe a couple of days ago. He also 
> agreed.
> May be we better use graphics/gimp (as it proposed in PR) for stable 
> port version? I doubt any time in the future we will want to have two or 
> more stable versions.

I agree.  I'll do the repo-copy in a few minutes.

Joe

> 
> All the best,
> Alexander.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20040327/61ca1012/attachment.bin