ports/62494: portupgrade -rf gettext -m BATCH=yes fails at gnomemeeting stage

[Stacey Roberts]

Hello Mark,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Linimon <linimon at lonesome.com>"
To: To Stacey Roberts
Date: Sun, 08 Feb, 2004 18:14 GMT
Subject: Re: ports/62494: portupgrade -rf gettext -m BATCH=yes fails at gnomemeeting stage

> No, it's not necessary; we can assign the updated PR to roger
> just as easily than a new one, and then there's one less PR to
> look after.

Fair enough..,

> 
> OTOH I don't really know how responsive roger has been recently,
> but that's the way we do things here ...
> 

I'll see what happens..,

> In any case, did you try the rebuild suggested by mezz in his
> response (pull up the amendend text to read it, if you didn't
> get it via email)?  The ports tree is going through about four
> large changes simultaneously and the problem may go away if you
> force things to rebuild.

Yes, I did. Those procedures did not fix the problem (results cc'd to gnome@), not did any of the other suggestions he had.

> 
> Generally, it's not necessary to do that, but if enough things
> move around in the infrastructure, it is.  (Some of the things
> in /usr/local/bin will have dependended on other, obsolete, things
> in /usr/local/bin by that point, etc.)

Not sure what this refers to..,

Regards,

Stacey

> 
> mcl
> 
> 

-- 
Stacey Roberts
B. Sc (HONS) Computer Science

Web: www.vickiandstacey.com